The Judiciary Branch of the United States government is responsible for interpreting the law. Those involved with this branch determine the meaning of the laws and decide what to do with those who break them. Because of a drug movement that took place through the 1980s, the courts have severely punished those who break laws associated to drugs; Congress is now trying to step in to change the way the Judiciary Branch is forced to punish such criminals. Congress has been busy the past couple of years evaluating the proper sentencing of those convicted of drug crimes. Many men and women of Congress are joining forces in an attempt to come up with a solution to propose as an amendment. Our elected leaders believe the need for the reform of drug crimes is due because of the number of cases and number of years those convicted are spending in prisons. Because of the drug wars that took place in the United States, the minimum sentence has been set so high today. Drug reform is needed in the United States, and those convicted of drug crimes with improper sentences need to have their sentence reduced. 1
The war on drugs began with the presidential term of President Nixon in the 1970s. According to drugpolicy.org, “He dramatically increased the size and presence of federal drug control agencies, and pushed through measures such as mandatory sentencing and no-knock warrants. Nixon temporarily placed marijuana in Schedule One, the most restrictive category of drugs.” While Nixon made it a major crime to possess and distribute drugs, including marijuana, several states went against his belief and decriminalized the use of marijuana. However, presidents weren’t done with their say in the use of drugs. President Ronald Re...
... middle of paper ...
... long. As it turned out, to her surprise, she was sentenced to 30 years in prison. A young lady with no criminal background was sentenced to three decades behind bars. But after the recent change in nonviolent drug charges, she had her sentence cut to 21 years, and she was released from prison. She has now returned home to her adult children. Nodd stated, “I didn’t need 20 years to learn my lesson. It would have taken me a month behind bars because it killed me to leave my kids.” Because of the old structured minimums that are set before our judges and juries, people like Nodd have to suffer unjust consequences.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... 460). Alexander points out that, “more African American adults are under correctional control now than were enslaved in 1850” (Alexander, p. 455). This is a shocking statistic, this suggest that most African Americans are affected by the war on drugs, whether it be themselves, a family member, or a loved one. With some many African Americans unable to vote in some states, and unable to find good housing and employment, it is no wonder that recidivism rates for prisoners is at an all time high in the United States.... [tags: African American, Jim Crow laws, Punishment]
1077 words (3.1 pages)
- ... Prisoners in federal prison are convicted with drug trafficking compared to simple possession to those in state prison. The rise of prisoners for drug crimes is too high, instead of focusing on criminals who commit violent crimes against other people. The social stigma faced by criminals is all the same even if they never committed a violent crime. Society tends to treat drug users the same way we treat the drug cartel. In studies people have been shown to be negative towards “criminals”. With labels of low socioeconomic status and minority race towards criminals (Madriz.1997.... [tags: Illegal drug trade, Heroin, Drug addiction, Drug]
1272 words (3.6 pages)
- ... Some of my own friends, more often of color, who were arrested for drug possession or use, are kept from earning a living dramatically, working in menial labor. In terms of upward mobility, their lives are essentially ruined, from a mistake they made in their teens, which harmed no one but themselves. The War on Drugs has allowed a discriminatory form of persecution in domestic law enforcement and is continually creating a class of Americans with fewer opportunities in education and employment.... [tags: Illegal drug trade, Prohibition]
1170 words (3.3 pages)
- Background Mandatory minimums for controlled substances were first implemented in the 1980s as a countermeasure for the hysteria that surrounded drugs in the era (“A Brief History,” 2014). The common belief was that stiff penalties discouraged people from using drugs and enhanced public safety (“A Brief History,” 2014). That theory, however, was proven false and rather than less illegal drug activity, there are simply more people incarcerated. Studies show that over half of federal prisoners currently incarcerated are there on drug charges, a 116 percent percentage rise since 1970 (Miles, 2014).... [tags: Prison, Mandatory sentencing, Heroin]
958 words (2.7 pages)
- ... The War on Drugs implemented by President Nixon in 1972 set the tone for the National policy on illegal drugs and since it was set into motion, it increases the number of drug offenders in jails by more than 1000%. It is a good thing to incarcerate individuals that break the law however non-violent drug charges are not the types of offenders that need to be locked up behind bars when prisons are at maximum capacity as shown in California. What are the social and individual implications of the current drug laws.... [tags: Prison, Mandatory sentencing, Crime]
1380 words (3.9 pages)
- ... According to Dr. Mulhausen, mandatory minimum drug sentences are necessary for combatting indeterminate sentences done by judges. With these indeterminate sentences, Dr. Mulhausen feared that judges were giving criminals a second chance at life at the expense of the safety of the ppublic. By doing this, criminals who should have been spending time in jail, were let free and often went on to victimize others instead of using their second chance for good. While the above two claims may make mandatory minnimum sentences seem like a positive and much needed law, what they are failing to mention is the negative social, economical and emotional effects that mandatory minimum drug sentences hav... [tags: Prison, Mandatory sentencing, United States]
1039 words (3 pages)
- The war on drugs has maintained an accumulation of prohibitions on illegal drugs and mandatory minimum sentencing strategies for drug offenders. Incarceration rates have also increased due to the increase of laws against illegal drugs. In Eugene Jarecki’s film, The House I Live In, Jarecki states that the penalties for crack users were harsher than penalties for regular cocaine users. This suggests that penalties are more of a double standard theory. The “War on Drugs” is more of a failure that places restrictions and prohibitions on drug offenders and has not necessarily shown a sense of equal stability; thus, leading to faulty sentences, misinterpretations of the real purpose of this initi... [tags: Illegal Drugs, War on Drugs]
995 words (2.8 pages)
- ... Once I began to research the “new Jim Crow laws” , they spiked my attention. I initially found it hard to believe that any current laws could compare to the horrible laws associated with JIm Crow. First I listened to a National Public Radio News podcast titled "Jim Crow Is Far From Dead." the host brought on an author of a book with this title “ Jim Crow Is Far From Dead.", Michelle Alexander and had her defend her ideas discussed in her book. Alexander (2010) did clarify for me that she and others with her same idea did not believe a set of individual laws that equated the laws of Jim crow but that the current criminal Justice system puts African Americans dispositionally in positions... [tags: population, numbers, drugs, crimes]
924 words (2.6 pages)
- The War on Drugs is Failing “Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance… for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man’s appetite by legislation and make a crime out of things that are not a crime. A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principle upon which our government was founded” Abraham Lincoln On January 16, 1920 the Eighteenth Amendment was ratified by thirty-six states and became part of the Constitution. The intention of this new amendment was to lower alcohol consumption by Americans.... [tags: George Bush's War on Drugs]
1223 words (3.5 pages)
- Throughout U.S governmental history, policies have been known to affect the way of life and every aspect. The topic it choose to research is about “The War on Drugs”, the impact policies have on society and if it does help the public or tend to extent social inequality. This topic is very important to me in the sense that, I look at the community I live and see how drugs have affected people lifes, broken up families and also destroyed the community itself. I wanted to know if the “war on drugs” stop our neighborhood from being flooded with drugs or it just over shadow the real problems that needs to be tackled.... [tags: War on Drugs Essays]
1807 words (5.2 pages)